| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
501. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Eve kills top 20: Generated from 2011-10-1 to 2011-10-08 1Drake42466 2Hurricane27855 3Abaddon14210 4Maelstrom13956 5Armageddon7406 6Tempest6844 7Scimitar5428 8Zealot4863 9Dramiel4607 10Rapier3596 11Sabre3574 12Hound3517 13Tengu3501 14Cynabal3395 ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.08 00:32:00
|
502. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Noob corp alt... Makes a claim... Unwilling even to consider listening to arguments against. Is unable to support his own claim it with any reasoning beyond "I still do it and I know people who do." Dismisses argument. Given survivability and sui...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.08 00:20:00
|
503. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
m0cking bird wrote: Also, active armor tanking is very viable, but like everything in life and this game. Their are limits... That loss mail proves nothing! All the metrics (killboards, fittings etc) show that active tanking is pointless in t...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.08 00:01:00
|
504. Turret Iteration - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nalha Saldana wrote: Todays long range turrets are horribly unbalanced and needs fixing. I made these graphs to explain its problem and a solution that I liked. Any arguments for changes are welcome, I'm not sure this is the best way to do it. ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.07 23:31:00
|
505. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Active armour tanking is not viable for modern PvP. http://exo.eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=9353757 Blaster tracking, without 90% webs, has meant that within optimal range, during realistic conditions, pilots will rarely do full damag...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.07 23:24:00
|
506. Active tanking bonuses, a straight up and down vote. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
No - Active tanking bonuses should not be replaced.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.07 22:50:00
|
507. Active tanking bonuses, a straight up and down vote. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Should active tanking bonuses (on none marauders) be replaced (with other bonuses, whether tanking or none tanking related?) Vote below...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.07 22:49:00
|
508. Active tanking bonuses, a straight up and down vote. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Yes - Active tanking bonuses should be replaced.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.07 22:49:00
|
509. Balancing Stratergy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
LuckOfCauthon wrote: "Hybrid Weapons Balancing" They will be looking at balancing the weapons, meaning they will not be trying to completely rebalance Gallente. I know what you mean by broadening the scope; The weapons are tied to other system...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.07 11:20:00
|
510. Balancing Stratergy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DarkAegix wrote: Pattern Clarc wrote: Instead of Hybrids, it should be Gallente. Ferox. Rokh. Eagle. Osprey. Navy Osprey. I don't even need to say anything else. The ships I listed explain my point perfectly. I hear you. Just out of i...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.07 11:16:00
|
511. Balancing Stratergy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Grimpak wrote: issue about hybrids is that there is another race that uses them (caldari) Whilst I agree, the point I was specifically making is that you have to provide a context for your solution to actually be viable. Boosting hybrids on ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.07 00:47:00
|
512. Balancing Stratergy? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Instead of Hybrids, it should be Gallente. Instead of Assault Frigates, it should be Frigates. Instead of Super Capitals, it should be Fleet Warfare. The issues are not independent, you cannot create a stable solution for one without a framew...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.07 00:09:00
|
513. 425mm Railgun Lead Rounds Have Less Mass Than a Fart (and the Numbers to prove i... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TL:DR? Boost Hybrids?
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.06 23:58:00
|
514. Comets and Ice Mining - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Comets should provide T2 minerals tbh. They should also be availible in low sec.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.06 01:43:00
|
515. FAO CCP Tallest, CCP Soundwave: Pilot Satisfaction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Also bumping
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.05 18:13:00
|
516. Gallente - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
@CCP No gallente boost will be complete by looking at Hybrids on their own. Ships, Active Tanking, Commandships and Battlecruisers... They are all interrelated.
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.05 18:09:00
|
517. New T2 modules? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Capital Mods? Faction T2? New Game mechanics :prays:
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.05 18:01:00
|
518. Sticky:New dev blog: EVE updating - Winter expansion 2011 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Please add ACTIVE TANKING BALANCING to that list as well please. Otherwise. EPIC
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.05 17:49:00
|
519. The Zulublog Raindance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
*clouds appear, rumbles of distant thunder are heard* Our lord has answered our prays.... *Looks up towards the sky as the rain beings to fall* Rain...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.05 17:29:00
|
520. The Zulublog Raindance - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Khanh'rhh wrote: I'm in if there's beer. There are beers, cocktails and all kinds of wines... Although please avoid the coolaid (for now...)
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2011.10.05 17:01:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |